Week 5. Tutorial Task.

Culture Jamming

Jasmine, Madelyn & Taylor. 

Ideas for Culture Jam

• Lowering the driving age to 15 instead of 17
• People can get their Learners license at 14 and their Driving permit at 15 years.
• This is being assessed in QLD only by Anna Bligh, with a quote:
• "Keep Australia in tune with America, where this driving rule is already in place." (post photo of young girl with L sticker) maybe take a video of a child opinion of the age change.
• Twitter page with a petition for people to follow (URL of page on Ireport.com) 
• using people like anna bligh and parliment officials to agree to pledge. 

Twitter Name: Sarah Jones 

Username: YouthDrivers Password: blogspot 

URL: https://twitter.com/YouthDrivers 

The Report for iReport
Queensland Transport and the Queensland Government have come together to announce a possible change to the driving age laws for Queensland youth. The current laws of obtaining a driviers permit licence at 17 years of age and a learners license at the age of 16 years old is being re-examined, with the full support of Anna Bligh, premier of Queensland. it has been stated that the driving age will be lowered to 14 years old for obtaining a learners license and at 15 years old, after one year and the 80 hours of driving experience, will be allowed to obtain a permit license.

The new law is being discusse and has recieved both criticism and positive support from Queenslands youth and parents Anna Bligh is seen to be a huge supporter of this proposition, with several coments being Tweeted on the 'Youth Drivers' support page on Twitter. To show your support for this new possible law or express your opinion about it, follow their page on Twitter: https://twitter.com1/YouthDrivers.


This report was unable to be posted on CNN ireport, due to the blocking of Griffith University's pages. 

Week 7 Tutorial Task.

 What is creative commons and how could this licensing framework be relevant to your own experience at university?

Creative Commons: (CC) is a non-profit organization headquartered in San Francisco, California, United States devoted to expanding the range of creative works available for others to build upon legally and to share.^[1] The organization has released several copyright-licenses known as Creative Commons licenses free of charge to the public. These licenses allow creators to communicate which rights they reserve, and which rights they waive for the benefit of recipients or other creators. An easy to understand one-page explanation of rights, with associated visual symbols, explains the specifics of each Creative Commons license. This simplicity distinguishes Creative Commons from an all rights reserved copyright. Creative Commons was invented to create a more flexible copyright model, replacing "all rights reserved" with “some rights reserved”. Wikipedia is one of the notable web-based projects using one of its licenses.

The organization was founded in 2001, with support of the Center for the Public Domain. The first set of copyright licenses were released in December 2002. In 2008, there were an estimated 130 million works licensed under Creative Commons.  Creative Commons has been embraced by many as a way for content creators to take control of how they choose to share their intellectual property. 

Creative commons is relevant to university study as it allows for peoples essays and journal articles to be easily accessed and viewed for future assignments. 

• Möller Erik, The Case for Free Use: Reasons Not to Use a Creative Commons -NC License, in Open Source Jahrbuch 2006.
• Plotkin, Hal (11 February 2002). "All Hail Creative Commons: Stanford Professor and Author Lawrence Lessig Plans a Legal Insurrection". SFGate.com.
• Schloman, Barbara F. (13 October 2003). "Creative Commons: An Opportunity to Extend the Public Domain". Online Journal of Issues in Nursing.
• Stix, Gary (March 2003). "Some Rights Reserved". Scientific American 288: 46. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0303-46.
• Weitzman, Jonathan B., and Lawrence Lessig. "Open Access and Creative Common Sense." Open Access Now, 10 May 2004
• Creative Commons home page

 Find 3 examples of works created by creative commons and embed them in your blog.

Click To Play

Click To Play

Click To Play

 Have a look at Portable Apps (a pc based application) – provide a brief description of what it is and how you think this is useful.


A portable app is a computer program that you can carry around with you on a portable device and use on any Windows computer. When your USB flash drive, portable hard drive, iPod or other portable device is plugged in, you have access to your software and personal data just as you would on your own PC. And when you unplug the device, none of your personal data is left behind.  http://portableapps.com/about/what_is_a_portable_app
I guess the initial benefit of portable apps is that it is 100% free, it allows people to have access to their computer (in a sense) without having to carry around their PC. It means that you could bring all of your stuff to uni on one USB and work from their. allowing quick easy access anywhere any time. 

Week 7 Tutespark.

GOOGLE CHROME

The free software which I chose to download and trial was Google Chrome. It is similar in use to another internet browser,Mozilla Firefox. However, i use google frequently and being able to type what I want to search directly into the space where you put the url address saved  some time. I also liked the way you can customize your homepage to have tiles of the most frequently visited websites along with bookmarked websites. also another feature of the software in which i thought saved time was how you are able to bookmark specific sites which then the icon is stored under the url bar, allowing to jump from one website to another without having to change pages. 

I also found that some pages were quicker when visited with the google chrome internet browser. However I did notice that some pages would not load until after I refreshed the page. 

All in all I liked using this free software and will most likely continue using it.

(http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/landing_chrome.html?hl=en&brand=CHMA&utm_campaign=en_au&utm_source=en_au-ha-apac-aunz-bk&utm_medium=ha)

Week 6 Tutespark.

Online Privacy & Social Networking.

There has been an out roar over the change of Terms of Use for Facebook users.(http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,494804,00.html) The change occured early 2009 where Facebook deemed that they now had the rights to use the content that you post on your profile wether active or not, to be able to make a profit. (http://www.webpronews.com/blogtalk/2009/02/16/facebook-now-owns-all-the-content-you-put-onfacebook) 
This change sparked controversy of what content you post online on various social websites is what you actually own. 


Considering this, you could then claim that Facebook would have to make all users sign a media release as they claim that they have rights to all content that you post including videos, pictures and text. how would this work for users under the age of 18 who need parental consent for their faces to be in the media? 


Opposing this are numerous websites which claim what you post on the internet  is your property as long as you have the rights to post such content and have not breeched any copyright laws. (http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071008031623AAXCMXD)


I guess in a sense the whole dilemma is based around the fact that in a way Facebook could take their identity away. 


CEO and founder of Facebook Mark Zuckerberg made a statement regarding the TOS debacle saying "Just trust us."(http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,494804,00.html)


How can we trust anyone when the content that we put on is not ours? 

Week 5. Tutespark.

 "Culture Jamming".


When investigating the term culture jamming i came across numerous terms which need to understood in order to properly engage and fully acknowledge the term "culture jam." 
Here are some terms which I found useful in order to understand the experience of "culture jamming."


Culture Jamming: a form of political and social activism which, by means of fakeadverts, hoax news stories, pastiches of company logos andproduct labels, computer hacking, etc, draws attention to and atthe same time subverts the power of the media, governments,and large corporations to control and distort the information thatthey give to the public in order to promote consumerism,militarism, etc
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/culture+jamming 


Mainstream: belonging to or characteristic of a principal, dominant, orwidely accepted group, movement, style, etc.: mainstreamRepublicans; a mainstream artist.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/Mainstreams


Subvertising: refers to the practice of making spoofs or parodies of corporate and political advertisements. Subvertisements may take the form of a new image or an alteration to an existing image, often in a satirical manner. A subvertisement can also be referred to as a meme hack and can be a part of social hacking or culture jamming.
 Sore-Loserman: From political parody to charity's windfall. CNN. 4 Dec. 2000.


Radio Jamming: is the (usually deliberate) transmission of radio signals that disrupt communications by decreasing the signal to noise ratio. Unintentional jamming occurs when an operator transmits on a busy frequency without first checking whether it is in use, or without being able to hear stations using the frequency. Another form of unintentional jamming occurs when equipment accidentally radiates a signal, such as a cable TV plant that accidentally emits on an aircraft emergency frequency.
Audio sample of jamming (c1982) at start of BBC World service (Russian) programme


Guerrilla communication and communication guerrilla:  refer to unconventional forms of communication and/or intervention in public events or discourse, for reasons ranging from political activism to marketing.
Memefest, international festival of radical communication




Examples of culture Jamming


Original Culture Jam: 


Culture Jamming was originally coined by the San Fransisco band Negativland, when they released JamCon'84. However, evidence of modern culture jamming can date back as far as the 1950's when the  European Situationists were active, being led by Guy Debord.
 Their main argument was based on the idea that in the past humans dealt with life and the consumer market directly. They argued that this spontaneous way of life was slowly deteriorating as a direct result of the new "modern" way of life. Situationalists saw everything from television to radio as a threat. The situationist International (SI) also played a dominant role in promoting the idea of cultre jamming in the minds of society during the late 1960's. The SI first compared its own activities to radio jamming in 1968, when it proposed the use of guerrilla communication within mass media to sow confusion within the dominant culture.
Dery, Mark (1993). Culture Jamming: Hacking, Slashing, and Sniping in the Empire of Signs. Open Magazine Pamphlet Series: NJ."Shovelware". Markdery.com. Retrieved 2009-07-23
Kyoto Journal: Culture Jammer's Guide to Enlightenment


Most Influential Culture Jam:  
 "Culture jammers will often use common memes to such as the McDonald's golden arches or Nike swoop to engage people and force them to think about their eating habits or fashion sense^[7] In one example, jammer Jonah Perreti used the Nike symbol to stir debate on sweatshop child labor and consumer freedom. Perreti made public exchanges between himself and Nike over a disagreement. Perreti had requested custom Nikes with the word "sweatshop" placed in the Nike symbol. Nike, of course, disagreed. Once this story was made public over Perreti's website it spread world wide and sparked the conversation and dialogue about Nike's use of sweatshops."
Tietchen, T. Language out of Language: Excavating the Roots of Culture Jamming and Postmodern Activism from William S. Burroughs' Nova Trilogy Discourse: Berkeley Journal for Theoretical Studies in Media and Culture. 23, Part 3 (2001): 107-130.
 I have attached the link of the emails to and from Perriti regarding His Nike "sweatshop shoes." 
http://www.shey.net/niked.html 

Most Damaging Culture Jam:  
 A culture Jam that i found most damaging was where Adbusters sought legal action where they were able to legalling jam Car advertisements regarding climate change. I think that considering that climate change is so sensationalised in the mass media and it is insesintly being discussed in politics, that in the 21st centruy it would be most damaging. It alsio highlights the corporate social responisbility that these big organisations should respond to and respect. 
It was on "April 3, 2009, the British Columbia Court of Appeal unanimously overturned a BC Supreme Court ruling that previously dismissed the case in February 2008. The court granted Adbusters the ability to legally go after the major corporations that originally refused to air their anti-car ad “Autosaurus”, specifically the Canadian Broadcasting Company and CanWest Global. The ruling represents a big victory for Adbusters, but it is the first step of their intended goal, essentially opening the door for future legal action against the media conglomerates. Co-founder Lasn declared the ruling a success and said, “After 20 years of legal struggle, the courts have finally given us permission to take on the media corporations and hold them up to public scrutiny."
"About Adbusters
"Adbusters Wins Legal Victory in Ongoing Case Against the CBC and CanWest", www.marketwire.com, April 6, 2009

Here are some more examples of Culture Jamming: